Showing posts with label Theocracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theocracy. Show all posts
Thursday, April 3, 2014
John Roberts and SCROTUS: America's Festering Hemorrhoid
Our Supreme Court has dissolved into a pathetic catastrophe.
Yesterday's blatantly CORRUPT decision regarding CORRUPTION was another abomination from a Court I have entirely lost faith in.
John Roberts' writing of the decision was reminiscent of the graven messages left by the “Lipstick Killer,” William Heirens.
Heirens had a compulsion to kill, that he couldn't control. He was given the nickname “The Lipstick Killer,” by leaving messages on the walls of his victims' bedrooms written in lipstick, reading “For heaven's sake catch me before I kill more. I cannot control myself.”
Here's what I mean by that...
John Roberts wrote the decision HIMSELF. In it, he basically said that in order to prove corruption or bribery, you have to PHYSICALLY CATCH money changing hands ON VIDEO, in order for it to be confirmed as corruption.
“Justice” Roberts, though, must have gotten this little tip from the Koch brothers, when he spoke at one of their anal-tongue-cleansing seminars (loosely billed as “conferences”). He would have NEEDED that tip to deal with a guilty conscience, seeing as how he was about to make SEVERAL decisions in their favor, while completely ignoring the Constitution.
Let's be honest, though... there are more people in SCROTUS than JUST Roberts, who is actually SMALL POTATOES when you compare his corruption to that of “Justice” Uncle Thomas.
We should have known this guy would be an insufferable, worthless douchebag during the Anita Hill hearings... but the problem is, we have too many other insufferable, worthless misogynists in America, who decided that she must have been lying because she's a woman. Honestly, that's the ONLY reason he was confirmed. He's a misogynist, and he appealed to all the other American misogynists.
Before becoming a “Justice,” Thomas was a Corporate Lawyer for Monsanto. Since then, he has never recused himself from judging a Monsanto case, and has found in their favor EVERY FUCKING TIME!!! I should say, though... what do you expect from the company that used to make AGENT ORANGE for use in Viet Nam? Obviously, they have no conscience; and neither does Thomas.
Thomas' wife, Ginny, is very politically active in the Tea Party, takes some of her paychecks from the KOCH BROTHERS and other billionaires, who her husband conveniently finds in favor of every time one of them appears before their court.
Thomas has also been caught cheating on his taxes... not reporting all of his income... not reporting parts of his wife's income... more evidence that he doesn't want to get caught being corrupt!
I would take a stab and say that “Justice” Thomas is THE SINGLE MOST CORRUPT SUPREME COURT “JUSTICE” IN AMERICAN HISTORY! Furthermore, I would argue that there is plenty of evidence to back up that claim.
If the Supreme Court were “Alice in Wonderland,” “Justices” Alito and Scalia would be Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum. I've always seen these two failures of American Education as interchangable. I've never known them to disagree with each other, and they have the common sense of DRYER LINT, whilst maintaining the intellectual consistency of RUNNY SNOT!
Basically, these two are Theocrats masquerading as “Justices”. They only believe that ONE religion exists, and that ONLY THAT RELIGION should be granted protection under the law; and that NO other religion matters, because it's not a “real religion,” because it's not what THEY believe.
They are BOTH Creationists, who, as we all know, are absolute fucking morons, with no critical thinking ability whatsoever!
Great... two Creationists sitting on the SUPREME FUCKING COURT... yeah... THAT'S what we need... people with an absolute absence of intellectual integrity... THAT'LL do this country good...
Creationists are archaic, moronic IDIOTS, who have NO BUSINESS being ANYWHERE NEAR law... but we have TWO of them on our HIGHEST COURT (and more than a few on the CONGRESSIONAL SCIENCE COMMITTEE... but that's another rant)!!!
So, here's my question...
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Don't Forget About the Stupid People
“The best
laid plans of mice and men often go astray.”
-John Steinbeck
I don't want
to come off as a pessimist, but here's the thing...
I'm
frustrated. I'm pissed off. I feel disenfranchised. I feel
ignored.
… and
here's why...
I've written
letter after letter to politicians, and more than a few to political
parties. I keep telling them one thing. In a nutshell, it can be
boiled down to this:
Don't forget
about the stupid people.
… and here's
what I mean by that...
The great
George Carlin once said, “Imagine how stupid the average person
is... now, realize that half the people are even dumber than that!”
I've found this philosophy very useful in understanding the reasons
that things are so bad right now.
You've got a
bunch of evil, rich douchebags (like the Koch brothers) who
understand how stupid people are, and have a subordinate organization
(the Republican Party) to push their agenda and make it sound
reasonable to said “stupid people”.
On the other
side, you've got a bunch of people (the Democratic Party) who are so
smart, they're stupid as well. These people, however, aren't stupid
in the same way. Unlike the Republican stupid people, they possess
the ability of CRITICAL THINKING! Unfortunately, that means that
they think EVERYONE possesses the ability of critical thinking. As a
result, they expect that the Republicans will have a sudden bout of
rationality.
The fact of the
matter is, if they are not able to think critically, then they will
NEVER have that much-desired bout of rationality! The Democratic
Party wants to give the stupid people the “benefit of the doubt.” They think that people will suddenly just "wake up." They also, unfortunately, think that talking down to people is rude.
It's not
“talking down” to people, though, if you're talking to them in a
manner that they can relate to. If you talk over too many people's
heads, they'll be more offended. They're more likely to think you're
calling them stupid if you say things they are incapable of
understanding, than if you HUMBLE yourself to speak to them in a way
they can actually fucking relate to.
Remember during
the 2008 elections, Republicans were referring to Democrats as
“elitist?”
That's what
they meant. “Elitism” means something different to Republicans
than it does to Democrats.
Democrats see
“elitism” as wealthy people talking down about poor people, as
rich "Affluenza cases" are want to do, and have been increasingly verbal about.
Republicans see
“elitism” as people who talk over their heads. Don't forget...
these are people who OPPOSE education! Remember this?:
They think that
education is “Liberal Indoctrination,” so they REJECT education
readily! Therefore, when someone is more intelligent than them, they
must be talking down to them like a snob! On top of that, if someone
is more educated than them, they must be a filthy, stinkin', no good,
Socialist, Fascist Liberal!
LET'S STOP
THERE FOR A MOMENT, AND I'LL POINT SOMETHING OUT:
Most people
WANT intelligent people leading them, don't they? After all, aren't smart people
going to make better decisions? You'd think so... right?
Most of US
would make that distinction, but when you see intelligence as the
ENEMY, you're not going to vote for intelligent people; you're going
to vote for people you believe to be more on YOUR level.
Let this serve
as evidence of my previously posed assertion as to the lack of
critical thinking skills of the people in the Republican Party. You
or I READILY see the blatant failure of logic in abject hatred of
intelligent people. Why do you think so many “facepalm” memes
are floating around social media?
Consider Ken
Ham, curator of the “Creation Museum.” He will never abandon his
beliefs, because he has absolutely NO way to weigh one set of facts
against another. Ergo, it really did nothing for Bill Nye to debate
him, other than giving people more ammunition to laugh at the
Creationists with. Very few positions will change.
NOW LET ME
STOP AGAIN AND POINT SOMETHING ELSE OUT:
This is a
perfect example of the stupidity of intelligent people. The notion
that debating indoctrinated people who completely lack reason might
actually accomplish something, depicts the inability of intelligent
people to realize HOW STUPID the stupid people are, and the lack of
understanding as to why.
How often do
you hear people ask, “Why don't they learn?” or “Why aren't
they getting this?”
These questions
often accompany facial expressions of pure confusion. The people
asking these questions (usually news commentators) sit there,
DUMBFOUNDED to the stupidity of things people say or do, never
realizing that they're reporting on people who have NO ABILITY to
change at this point!
ON A DAILY
BASIS, I see or hear a talk show host, or a journalist, or another
intellectual type person PULLING THEIR HAIR OUT because the person
they're debating simply has no ability to challenge their knowledge
or understanding, and the host completely fails to understand this
fact about them. It should be noted, however, that in the case of
politicians, they may be saying these things because they're PAID to
say these things, regardless of what they truly believe.
On social
media, if they feel they're being forced to challenge their beliefs,
they talk over the person they're debating, attempt to change the
topic, and ultimately resort to insults; many of which make no sense,
as the person using them has no concept as to their meaning, but
they've been told that these are BIG, BAD, DIRTY, LOW-DOWN things to
call people, like “Socialist,” “Marxist,” “Maoist,”
“Fascist,” and “Liberal.”
Think about
it... haven't you noticed these things, yourself? Haven't you
encountered people that are both incredibly stupid and incredibly
hard-headed? Haven't you encountered REALLY stupid people who
believe whole-heartedly that they're smarter than everyone else?
Too many
people are either too stupid to know they're stupid, or so smart,
they're stupid.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Colorado is NOT A "Purple" State!
Perhaps this
post is ill-timed, given the fact that election season is over, but I
feel this has to be said...
I'm tired of
people in the media describing Colorado as a “Purple” State.
I've been here
my whole life, and I can tell you, with most certainty, that Colorado
is neither a “Red” State nor a “Blue” State; but we're not
“Purple” (meaning, our elections could go either way).
While it's true
that Colorado went both times for Bush and both times for Obama, I
can tell you with absolute certainty that this is not a determinate
factor in our politics. Those factors barely scratch the surface of
our dynamic.
Here's the
truth (whether you like it or not)... Colorado is more of a
Libertarian State than one that “swings.” The voters here are
somewhat savvy when it comes to rationality and understanding of
complicated issues.
Colorado is a
very intelligent State by the numbers. As a State, we have the third
highest number of College Graduates per capita in the Country. Here
in Denver, libraries are easily found, as well as book stores coffee
shops (like the place I choose to write all this shit... shout out to
Fireside Books and Coffee, on Hampden and Delaware... stop in and
have a look around... this place is GREAT). We're a very literate
state!
We also have
the highest concentration of breweries in the Country; which dictates
our love of diversity and originality in tastes. This is also given
emphasis by our eclectic collection of international cuisine.
Colorado is a
haven for people who have a hard time finding where they belong.
I've always been a very social person, so I wind up talking to lots
of different people at the bars I frequent (like Sancho's Broken
Arrow, the Doghouse, and Armida's Karaoke Bar). Somewhere between a
third and a half of the people I meet have the same story... either
they know someone here, or they heard this was a cool place, so they
moved here and fell in love with Colorado.
The majority of
these people felt “out of place” in their former home for one
reason or another. As a result, Colorado (or, at least, Denver) has
become the cultural equivalent of the “Island of the Misfit Toys.”
We have a very large LGBT population, a very large geek population,
and a SHITLOAD of stoners (which is a GOOD thing... and supposedly,
Woody Harrellson, one of the “stoner kings,” is rumored to be moving here in light of Amendment 64)!
Our small towns
aren't as “rural” as the small towns in most of the rest of the
country. We have some VERY “liberal” small towns, like
Breckenridge, Colorado City, and Monument. The “Conservative rural
town” isn't as present here as it is in other parts of the country.
Colorado's
politics are basically controlled by our four largest cities: Denver,
Colorado Springs, Boulder, and Fort Collins. These four cities might
as well be separate countries. Boulder is the most “Liberal” of
the four cities, being that it has several colleges; and Colorado
Springs (the City I try to avoid like the plague... it's a whole
different universe) is the most “Conservative,” being the home of
the Air Force Academy and the original home of “Focus on the
Family” (which recently moved to Highlands Ranch; the most wealthy
and conservative suburb of Denver... Mike “The Lying Douchebag”
Coffman's district). Denver and Fort Collins, however, are not as
“Liberal” as the rest of the country would like to believe.
People here
have a strong attachment to individual rights and a “mind your own
fuckin' business” attitude with regards to law making. This is why
we were able to decriminalize marijuana, legalize medicinal marijuana, and eventually fully legalize
marijuana. This is also why I believe that we will see marriage
equality in the near future (our Statehouse already legalized “civil
unions” this year).
Being mostly
rational, intelligent people, we have found a balance; not between
Democrats and Republicans; but between Liberals and Libertarians.
Maybe it's just
the crew I run with, but the majority of the people I meet tend to
fall right down the middle of this dividing line.
I'll be
honest... I like it that way. The Libertarians here are much more
rational than Teabaggers or “typical” Republicans. You can
ACTUALLY have a REAL conversation with people, without it dissolving
into “YER JUST A LIBURUL DEMUCRAT COMMIE!” People openly and
freely express their opinions, and discuss them at length (and yes,
even in bars... I know... that's supposed to be a “no-no”; but it
works here).
I love the
friendly, approachable nature of our populous. We're easy and fun to
engage; and place great pride in the fact that we can have a
reasonable conversation about virtually any topic; even the ones that
are somewhat “touchy.”
As a result of
our somewhat Libertarian populous, the determinate factor in a
State-wide or National election isn't so much WHO'S running, but what
they represent. However, if voters in Denver, Boulder, and Fort
Collins sit out an election (as we saw in 2000 and 2004), the
Theocrats in Colorado Springs have a disproportionate voice to the
rest of the State, which makes us LOOK “purple.” When this
happens, the rest of us RATIONAL people get pissed. However, we
learn from our mistakes, so when these things happen, they usually
get corrected in the next election cycle.
Colorado is the
greatest place on Earth! Come and see for yourself... you'll quickly
learn that everything I've said is accurate and true!
To the media,
I'd like to say this...
STOP calling us
a “purple” state! If you want the straight beef, ASK THE PEOPLE
HERE! We LIKE to engage in these conversations! We LIKE to talk
about politics! Any chance we get to share in the glory of Colorado,
we take it!
Monday, March 25, 2013
Actually, Yes... You ARE a Bigot...
Some topics are
unavoidable when they're prominent in the news. Lately, one of these
topics has been that of marriage equality. One common theme keeps
popping up, and it BOTHERS THE SHIT OUT OF ME! One such discussion
happened recently at a local bar. It went something like this...
“I'm not a
bigot; I just don't think gays should marry...”
Actually,
yes... you ARE a bigot.
“NO I'M NOT!
I have friends who are gay...”
… and yet,
you think they're less of a human than you are?
“Why would
you say that?”
Well, you don't
think that they deserve to have the same rights that you do. If we,
as humans, are supposed to have equal rights, then why do you think
they don't deserve the same rights you do, then that would suggest
that you see them as less human.
“But the
Bible says it's wrong...”
Actually, the
OLD TESTAMENT says that, and a lot of other crazy things... you left
your ex-wife after she cheated on you... did you slaughter a fatted
calf after stoning her? CHRISTians are supposed to look to the words
of CHRIST; and in Matthew 19:12, he says (in the language of his
time) that some PEOPLE are born gay.
If they are,
indeed, people, as Jesus said, then don't they deserve to live under
the umbrella of the words “Love thy neighbor?”
It doesn't say:
“Love thy
neighbor*”
*Unless
they're gay
“But the
Church opposes it...”
The First 10
words of the First Amendment read “Congress shall pass no law
respecting an establishment of Religion.” The position of your
Church is irrelevant. Religious doctrine can't become law.
“But the next
part says 'nor abridging the free-exercise thereof.' Laws can't
discriminate on my religion.”
If you don't
support gay marriage, don't have one. Your religious beliefs aren't
being oppressed. However, if you're telling other people, who
believe differently than you; that marriage is about love, rather
than gender; that their religious beliefs can't be expressed, just
like your's, because of YOUR beliefs, then aren't their religious
beliefs being oppressed by yours?
“So just
because someone chooses to be gay, they should be allowed special
laws?”
When did you
choose to be straight? Furthermore, how is that a “special law?”
It seems to me that more laws have been created to DENY people this
right... simply removing those laws, to make the current laws apply
to EVERYONE sounds more like we're REMOVING “special laws,” going
the other way; just like the repeal of the 3/5 clause in the
Constitution.
"I didn't choose to be straight. I just know I am."
So I guess, then, it's outrageous to think that other people might be born different than you. I guess, then, everybody must be born with brown hair and blue eyes. I guess, then, everybody must need glasses. I guess we're all just born the same?
"Well, no... obviously not... but..."
So then, it's perfectly possible that someone else might grow up KNOWING they're gay... glad we settled that...
“But marriage
is a religious pact. If the Constitution can't tell us how to
worship, how can marriages be regulated by law?”
Actually,
marriage is a contractual agreement with the State and Federal
government. If it weren't, marriage status wouldn't affect taxes.
If marriage weren't a legal contract, then everybody would have to
file taxes individually, rather than as a married couple.
“But it'll
hurt the economy...”
How will more
weddings hurt an economy? That means more officiants, more cakes and
bakers and bartenders and caterers and limo drivers and dove handlers
and event planners and event centers (which may need to be built or
renovated) and more gift registries (which means more gift buying...
stuff needs to be made when stuff is bought) and more traveling and
more hotel stays and eating out and more flying and driving and
Amtraking and Busing... that all sounds like MORE jobs to me, and a
BETTER economy...
“Gay marriage
will threaten traditional marriages...”
So, if gays are
allowed to marry, would you leave your new wife for a man?
“No... I'm
not gay...”
Then YOUR
marriage won't be threatened. Why should it matter to you?
“Well, it
doesn't matter to me, but it
might affect other
people...”
And
why is that your business?
“Well,
it's not...”
Then
it shouldn't matter...
“But marriage
has ALWAYS been between one man and one woman.”
No it hasn't.
In Ancient Greece, Ancient Egypt, some Native American tribes,
Mormons, and many Muslim current countries, marriage is between one
man and SEVERAL women, or two people who love each other, regardless
of gender. The Roman Emperor, Caligula, married his horse. Clearly,
marriage has NOT always been between 'one man and one woman.'
“And Ancient
Greece and Rome fell; the Native Americans don't have many people
left; the Mormons abandoned polygamy; and the Muslims are... well...
Muslims...”
Greece and Rome
fell because their empires got too big to maintain, and they
collapsed beneath their own decadence and arrogance. Gay marriage
had nothing to do with it; furthermore, it's largely because of
CHRISTIANS that there aren't many Native Americans left; and after
your comment about Muslims, how can you say you're not a bigot?
“Well, I was
talking about gays; not Muslims...”
Should Muslims
be allowed to marry?
“Well, of
course they should.”
So why is it ok
for Muslims, but not gays?
“Muslims
believe in a God, just like I do.”
So Atheists
shouldn't be allowed to get married, either?
“I didn't say
that...”
Yes, you did...
you said that the reason Christians and Muslims should be allowed to
marry, is because they believe in God. Alternately, if someone
doesn't believe in God, they shouldn't be allowed to marry.
“I didn't say
that. There's no reason Atheists shouldn't marry...”
… as long as
they're not gay...
“Right...”
Tell me again,
how are you not a bigot?
“...
uhhhhh...”
Labels:
ANTIplutocracy,
Barney Frank,
Brode,
cafeterianism,
civil rights,
Constitution,
Dan Savage,
first amendment,
George Takei,
god,
Harvey Milk,
Norman Goldman,
philosophy,
rationality,
religion,
Theocracy
Monday, March 4, 2013
Cultivating the Stupid
… perhaps I
spend too much time on social media...
… perhaps I
read too much...
… perhaps I
know too much...
… or maybe
I'm just delusional...
… but I
keep seeing something that bothers the living shit out of me...
I've been in a
few “debates” with people who think public education should be
eliminated because (paraphrasing their arguments) “education is
liberal indoctrination.” It always comes from the same types of
people... Fundamentalist Christians who either send their children to
religious school or home-school them.
The bigger
problem is, it's spreading. A simple Google search will reveal A SHITLOAD of articles that people have written to make people FEAR the education system! Does that make ANY sense at all???
… and that's
just the beginning... barely scratching the surface of the problem...
Here's the
thing... OBVIOUSLY, stupid people are easier to control and
manipulate than people who are competent of the world around them.
There has even
been a Presidential Primary Candidate who espoused these beliefs;
Rick Santorum. Don't forget, he was also the guy who said, “We will never have the elite smart people on our side.”
Yes, there are
LITERALLY people IN GOVERNMENT who are asking you to retain your
ignorance... doesn't that just PISS YOU OFF???
Obviously,
these people are too stupid to recognize a stupid idea when they hear
it.
Is there any
way we could declare willful stupidity a form of insanity??? I mean,
that's completely antithetical to the PURPOSE of being alive... the
purpose of life is to ADVANCE THE SPECIES for the lives of those who
come after!
… and
advancement doesn't mean breeding like rabbits... it means making a
BETTER species; not a BIGGER species. If we're going to be the top
of the food chain, it should be because we have the tools to survive
and excel; not just because we have a large population!!!
So, when people
reject something that SHOULD be the most BASIC form of rationality,
shouldn't we be able to declare them to be a threat to themselves and
society? I wouldn't say it, if it weren't true... I mean, they ARE a
threat to themselves and society... just look at the House of
Representatives... look at the gerrymandering... look at the
Theocratic proposals... look at the denial of reality... all signs
that their INSANITY has done great damage to society, and through
their rejection of rationality, damage to themselves...
In jest, may I
suggest that we re-instate the “3/5 Compromise” in the 14thAmendment; but relate it to indoctrinated morons instead of black
people? Maybe then, they'll be forced to realize how stupid they
are, and they'll be forced to look at what their stupidity has done
to us...
… a man can
dream, can't he?
Seriously...
it's time we stopped letting the stupidest people make all the
decisions for us!!! I mean, look at all the morons who buy into
douchebags like Alex Jones (who may actually be a sign that evolution
CAN go in reverse)...
...look at all
the people who think Michele Bachmann is smart enough for government
(I swear, there is just something WRONG with that woman... maybe her
parents threw her on the “Tilt-A-Whirl” too early or something...
or maybe she just liked taking “clothes dryer rides” when she was
a kid)...
… look at all
the people who think Glenn Beck knows what he's talking about...
Yes, these
people are evidence that the “Dunning-Kruegger Effect” is alive
and well; and that it's causing us MAJOR problems within our voting
populous.
The Republicans
have allowed a culture of stupidity to fester and spawn; and now that
it's causing a problem, there's no turning back. They've allowed TOO
MUCH stupid to fill their ranks, and now they're rapidly becoming an
obsolete brand of Theocrats and indoctrinated fools.
I realize that
this may be a little too harsh for some people's taste... personally,
I don't give a shit...
I find
ignorance to be OFFENSIVE... and when that ignorance is WILLFUL, that
goes beyond offensive to despicable!
This trend can
be traced back to Ricard Nixon's “Southern Strategy.” He needed
votes, and he was desperate, so he decided to appeal to the Southern
“Dixiecrats,” who were basically the former Democrats who were
opposed to the direction that the party had taken with regards to
Civil Rights (women's suffrage, voting rights, etc).
Now, we all
know that bigots and misogynists are on the VERY BOTTOM of the
intellectual scale, so we can start to see where this is heading. By the time that Regan came along, the Plutocrats saw that all the dumbest people
were packaged up in a nice, neat little box, so they knew they could
easily control them with the fear and hate that already welled deeply
within them. Furthermore, they knew that many of them had
inseparable ties to their faith, which gave them another means of
control.
… draw the
conclusion that the whims of the rich are actually “Christian
values,” and they'll follow you FOREVER!
So, when it
worked for the bankers, then they knew it would work for the oil
industry... and the pharmaceutical industry... and any douchebag
employer who thinks their employees are lesser humans (I'm looking at
YOU, Wal Mart)... and the tobacco industry...
Eventually, it
became EASY for douchebags to deceive and control the dumbest among
us... they had people like Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly to do
their bidding. They could convince people of anything they wanted.
… and then,
along came the climate discussion...
Knowing that
the base of the party was already prone to reject science in favor of
their own beliefs, they knew that it would be easy to convince people
that ecological studies are founded in “junk science,” so that
they didn't have to worry about pesky agencies like the EPA...
… I mean, if
it's science, then it MUST be against the Bible SHOMEHOW, right? God
made this world PERFECT, so nothing man can do has the power to break
it, right? If it's “God made,” then it must be flawless...
… seems
legit...
Now, all these
people have been so deceived that there may be no coming back from
this. They've spent so much time “cultivating stupid” that
there's not enough rationality left in the party to bring it back to
the centrist level that it needs to be in order for our country to
operate in the way that it needs to.
Translation:
we're in for a few REALLY HARD decades... get your helmets on,
because the repeated face-palms could, at some point, cause a
concussion...
... because
now, they haven't just “cultivated” the stupid... they've ELECTED
it!
Once the stupid
spreads far enough and seeps deep enough into the populous that
enough people are willing to ELECT the stupid, then it's seeped into
the foundation; which means the house has to be torn down and rebuilt
from the base up...
There will, of
course, be a period before the property is bought, in which the house
just sits there...
… condemned...
...boarded-up...
… haunted by
the demons of the past...
… who will
have to be exercised in order for rebuilding to take place...
… but until
then, you might want to wear waders in the basement, because the SHIT
gets DEEP!!!
Labels:
Antiestablishment,
ANTIplutocracy,
Brode,
cafeterianism,
civil rights,
Constitution,
Dunning-Kruegger Effect,
editorial,
Fourteenth Amendment,
god,
humor,
Opinion,
philosophy,
plutocracy,
rationality,
Theocracy
Monday, February 18, 2013
Personally, I Don't Give A Shit...
… about the
Pope... and I'll tell you why...
I think it's
safe to say that the Catholic Church is a nation without borders.
The Pope, being the figurehead of their government, in my opinion,
has a lot to answer for. At this point, I don't give a shit about
who the fuck they choose, because no matter who it is, he's still
going to be a symbol of a nation that continues to cling to archaic
ideas that are doing the world's population GREAT harm!
At a time when
THE REST OF THE WORLD is trying to battle AIDS in Africa, the Pope
keeps coming along and SHAMING PEOPLE for taking the necessary
precautions to prevent the spread of a deadly disease. How can he be
considered a “humanitarian” whose organization “helps the
poor,” if he stands in the way of the devices that the poor need?
The Ten
Commandments says “Love thy neighbor”... but apparently, that
stops at the doorstep of a GAY neighbor... even though Jesus never
told you to hate anyone other than “Money Changers”... Jesus
never said ANYTHING about hating the gays... in fact, Mat. 19:12 iswhere Jesus said that gay people are BORN GAY! But the Pope still
believes them to be lesser humans. Jesus, himself, said that people
were born gay, which means that they are no different than the
“neighbors” spoken of in the Ten Commandments. For that matter,
would Jesus think there are ANY “lesser humans?” We're talking
about a guy who hung out with whores and lepers... a person who said
“Whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me.”
Did you hear
that? He used the word “BROTHERS”... that means no matter WHO
they are, we're all in the same brotherhood of man... which means
that the Church's bigoted posturing against gay human beings is
entirely antithetical to the words of the person their whole religion
is built around!
… On top of
that... if Jesus hated the “Money Changers” (bankers), then why
is there a “Vatican Bank?”
The Catholic
Church CLAIMS to preach peace... and yet, owns a controlling stake inBeretta Arms...
I'm sorry, but
you can't have it both ways. You can't claim to “preach peace”
while manufacturing weapons of war. That's the ULTIMATE hypocrisy!
… but then
again, the Catholic Church HAS been known, in the past, to use...
shall we say...
... less than
subtle techniques...
...to get
people to convert...
More than once,
they've seen death as a punishment for the “crime” of not
believing what they do.
… so if
that's the case, then why should we be SURPRISED that they own an arms company??? They haven't historically been the
“friendliest” religion when it comes to people who believe
differently, so I suppose this is just the next natural step for
them... although... that doesn't indemnify them from the label of
hypocrisy... that's going to linger around their neck until they give
up imperialism as a business model.
Now, let's
consider the number of pedophile Priests that the Vatican has covered
for. People DESERVE justice for the ways they've been wronged, and
the Pope stands between the humiliation of the Church and the simple
acknowledgement of wrongdoing to the victims!
Yes, the Church SHOULD be humiliated! But with their refusal to submit to justice, they're only digging their hole deeper. If the Pope would just come out and APOLOGIZE, and stop protecting the bastards, that would go a long way towards reconciliation... just ADMITTING that they have a problem... JUST ACKNOWLEDGING IT...
... but they won't even do that...
In my mind, the
Catholic Church has a lot to answer for... genocides... hypocrisy...
pedophilia... spread of disease... malicious hate...
… and until
they have a Pope who's willing to speak to these atrocities, I don't
give a shit about the Pope.
Anybody else agree???
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



